OEB08
From Mediawiki2
Contents |
[edit] Building an Open Global Learning Infrastructure
More info about the workshop on the online educa berlin website.
[edit] Draft Program
- 10h00-10h15: welcome (Krämer & Duval)
- take notes on wiki or mindmeister or ...?
- eleed (peer-reviewed open access journal on e-leaning and education
- introduction slides
- 10h15-10h30: why do we need an open global learning infrastructure? (Duval, slides)
- 10h45-11h00: Cees Brouwer (OU-NL) - perspective from an open university (slides)
- 11h15-11h30: coffee
- 11h30-11h45: Miguel Rodriguez Artacho - perspective from authors (UNED slides)
- 12h00-12h15: Jan Beniest - perspective from a user community (agriculture, slides)
- 12h45-13h30: lunch
- 13h30-13h45: Volker Zimmermann (IMC) - corporate perspective
- 14h00-14h15: Jeff Merriman (MIT) - perspective from a research university (consumer choice, OKI Project, UOC Campus Project, Tufts VUE Project example of plug and play)
- 14h30-14h45:
Moritz Stefaner - perspective from user community (architecture) - 14h45-15h15: David Massart - Learning Resource Exchange for Schools: Current Infrastructure & Issues (slides)
- The LRE portal
- The LRE documentation
- 15h30-15h45: coffee
- 15h45-16h00: Tsuneo Yamada (NIME) - An Asian perspective (slides)
- 16h15-16h30: Wolfgang Nejdl (L3S) - So how can I ask for it? (slides)
- 16h45-17h00:
Phillip Long - lectures from the past - 16h45-17h00: Jan Philipp Schmidt - Peer 2 Peer University
- 17h15-17h30: wrap-up, action plan, take home, follow-up
[edit] Participants
if you want - link a page about you
- Duval, Erik
- Krämer, Bernd (representing the e-learning portal CampusContent)
- Schmidt, Jan Philipp (talking about P2PU)
- Topol, Pawel
- Zobel, Annett (will give a demo of CampusContent Thursday, room: Potsdam III from 14.30 to 17.30. as part of the Online EDUCA program)
- Davor Orlic (representing the video educational portal VideoLectures.NET and partnership with MIT OpenCourseWare)
[edit] Photos
[edit] Workshop evaluation
A standard Online EDUCA evaluation questionnaire was distributed during the workshop. All respondents confirmed that the description of the event did meet their expectations.
| Very good | Good | Sufficient | Poor | |
| Content | 53% | 47% | ||
| Presentation | 53% | 33% | 14% | |
| Management | 66% | 27% | 7% | |
| Usefulness | 40% | 53% | 7% | |
| Overall evaluation | 60% | 40% |
Some comments from the audience:
- One of the best and most innovative workshop that I have ever attended; mix of interesting content, guest facilities, lots of brainstorming and inspirational discussions
- Great participation from the floor and interesting topics
- Great, provide this again
- I was expecting a bit more ‘technical’ presentation: standards, specifications, what to do next; some presentations were more a ‘marketing ones’; also a theme about using closed technologies (flash?) in open world and reusing could have been touched (how do I reuse something like that even if it is ‘legal’)
